[论文投稿] 化学类高端杂志的审稿细则

If you recommend revision, please make your comments as constructive as possible to help the authors improve their paper. Please do not attempt to re-write the paper. It is the responsibility of the authors to produce a clear manuscript in correct English. Extensive editing and/or rephrasing is not being requested. It is helpful, however, if you can mention typographical, spelling and grammatical errors, but this is not essential.

Authors are allowed to submit only one revision and therefore your comments should be sufficiently detailed for the authors to make all necessary changes that can eventually lead to acceptance. If a revised manuscript is sent back to you the only response required will be a simple yes or no to the question, "Is the paper now suitable for publication?"

Overall recommendation:

____Accept

____Minor Revision

____Major Revision

____Major Revision Requiring Re-review

____Reject



Is the paper of sufficient originality to warrant

publication in Polymer?

YES____

NO ____



(Papers that are scientifically flawed, provide no new

insight, merely report observations

without analysis or comment, are incomplete or of

insufficient priority should be rejected)



Can the paper be shortened without detriment?

YES____

NO ____

(If yes, please indicate what can be removed in your report)





Is the paper clearly and sensibly arranged?

YES____

NO ____

(If no, but otherwise acceptable, please suggest necessary

improvements in your report)





Are the analysis and conclusions a logical outcome of the

data and

discussion?

YES____

NO ____

(If no, please state the errors clearly in your report)





In your judgement, where does this paper lie in relation to

cognate papers in primary polymer science journals?



Top 25% ____

Top 50% ____

Bottom 50% ____

Bottom 25% ____


If in the bottom 50% but you nevertheless feel that the

paper should be published in Polymer, please give brief

reasons why in the below space.


Detailed comments:

可见新是最主要的。大家切记。