返回列表 回复 发帖 点我体验网上斗地主的乐趣

[讨论交流] 关于LAMMPS的库仑作用

相关搜索: LAMMPS, 库仑
今天看到一个人给steve发信问下面一个问题,其实也是我以前头疼的一个问题,steve没有给出解决方法,不知道大家有没有高见?

=======================================
Dear LAMMPS users and developlers,

I recently want to calculate the total energy of every atom in the
simulation domain, however, I looked through "compute pe/atom" and found
that coulomb energy is not included, is there some way to overcome this and
get the total energy per atom in LAMMPS? Also, is it the same case with
force per atom? Thanks!

--
Thanks and Best Wishes.

Sincerely yours,
Bo Qiu
http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~qiub/homepage/
=======================================
Short-range Coulombic energy per-atom is included.  Not long-range.
Not clear how to even compute per-atom long-range energy.

Steve
=======================================
【生活就要耐住寂寞,面对现实微笑,越过障碍注视未来】
============================================
My website: http://groups.google.com/group/tianwd?hl=zh-CN
there are several methods to compute the long range part of electrostatic energy, but none of them can do this. Note that when pbc is applied, I wanna know how to.
1. 为避免资源重复,发贴前请先搜索论坛
2. 请多发好贴,多参加讨论交流,欢迎原创心得分享和经验总结
3. 短消息只处理站务相关问题,有问题请发帖交流
4. 学术交流,灌水者请自重
Probably write a code to deal with it.
用中文问一下  Lammps 是用来MD的还是第一原理的? MD不是靠牛顿和热统的吗? 是不是外层电子的相互作用在计算势的时候考虑过了。 pe/atom ( pe:potential energy?)
MD跟第一性原理不是一个概念上的东西
虽然很多MD是用非第一原理的势能模型计算能量
早就有了第一原理MD
经验势是原子层次不是电子层次
只能说包含了电子贡献或效应 但是程度也就是精度不能保证
1

评分次数

  • homeboy

We have developed the code doing that. Not easy to do it and one of the tricks is the dimensions or PBC.....Since charges are there, surface will be much different from the bulk.
返回列表

本站属于学术,非经营性网站
本站所有资源均来自于互联网,所有个人文章和言论并不代表本站立场,如发现有侵权行为,请与我们联系,我们将在3个工作日内做出相应处理并给予答复